Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atheistic nationalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:38, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Atheistic nationalism[edit]

Atheistic nationalism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not covered significantly as a unified subject in reliable sources outside of mirrors. Results are mirrors and text where someone mentions in passing that a brand of nationalism is in an atheistic way. I prefer deletion, but I'm open to a merge if there is a suitable target.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  02:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  02:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  02:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  02:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  02:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  02:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete At first glance, it seems it does not have any good sources to deserve an article. I will try to look for more sources, but as it is it barely has any encyclopedic value. Ebacci EN (talk) 04:10, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete As per the nomination. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 05:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, not only because as Nom states, the term is not in significant use as a term of art, but because in a quick search, where these two word ane used in conjunction in phrases like "All forms of pagan or atheistic nationalism are demonic", "should penetrate beyond the shell of secular atheistic nationalism into the divine spark at the core of...", or "It is fashionable to ascribe the horrors of Nazism to an atheistic nationalism", there are simple 2 words that convey a meaning, but not a defined ideology. The exception to this is with regard to Soviet Russia. There I did see what seems like use of this phrase as a sort of term of art:"they sought to supplant religious faith with a new religion—atheistic nationalism—making this, and not the Russian Orthodox Church,the focal point for...", but I did not find enough such uses to persuade me that it is a commonly used or notable term of art.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:03, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. P (talk) 16:01, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete -- The two cases quoted were part of a totalitarian effort to control everything, including religion. Nationalism was merely a means of focusing this. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:49, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete - seems to be a WP:Neologism and fail WP:OR. Smmurphy(Talk) 19:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.