Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atheist prayer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete as WP:SNOW. KrakatoaKatie 08:54, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Atheist prayer[edit]
- Atheist prayer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Apologies if this article might meet the speedy deletion criteria, but i'm having trouble placing it in a speedy deletion category, so i'm making an AfD. This article's entire content is derived from a single blog entry by a person of undiscernable (and apparently non-existant) notability, and the link itself has been placed in several articles like Theism together with mention of "Atheist prayer", and despite explanations by myself and now at least one other person on the talk page of the person using the link, this article itself has now been created. Homestarmy 00:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, if "only known publication" is a blog entry, by definition it fails to have reliable sources and cannot be notable. Asserts unnotability. --Dhartung | Talk 00:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Completely devoid of WP:RS. --Evb-wiki 01:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Maybe it should have been A7ed, but what be the harm in letting it sit long enough for either a Snowstorm consensus to build (which IMHO should be more than 4 opinions,) or for somebody to come up with further sources if remotely possible? Given there's nothing in my library to support the concept, but you never know what philosophers and/or theologians might have further references. LaughingVulcan 02:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The author, Mrdmidbar (talk · contribs), has only ever edited to introduce the Atheist's prayer (with link) into related pages, and has been warned for spamming this. --h2g2bob (talk) 03:13, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This atheist prays this gets Deleted Nick mallory 03:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to OxymoronDelete. Atheists with deeper religious experiences?! Clarityfiend 03:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]- WP:DAFT as spam and OR. Morgan Wick 03:39, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - pure neologism, with no notability. --Haemo 06:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article is just advocacy for a point of view espoused in only one blog. --Metropolitan90 06:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.