Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atheif

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Ariel Pink. MBisanz talk 00:03, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Atheif[edit]

Atheif (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about non notable album, all references are simply discographies and sales sites. Searches bring up zero reliable sources, fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 23:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Two real problems with this nomination. Firstly, the article isn't about an album, Secondly, merging and redirecting to Ariel Pink would be obviously preferable to deletion. --Michig (talk) 10:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Ariel Pink. Agree that there's insufficient notability to warrant a freestanding article. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 23:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.