Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/At!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:45, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

At![edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable third party sources, and nothing in this article which suggests that this performer is notable. Woogee (talk) 02:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:N. Good faith Google searches for "At!", "At Crossing the Line", "At Kimi ga Hoshii" and "At Defrock Records" return no relevant hits whatsoever. The fact that the article was created by a single purpose account lead me to suspect it's a vanity page, and the tone and content of the article (plus the ???? for year of birth) suggest it's a school-age individual pimping either a non-notable music project or something they made up. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:19, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable--poorly written vanity page. For giggles, look up one of the "references" originally in the article, www.wetpaint.com. Drmies (talk) 05:54, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non notable. Anna Lincoln 08:48, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Poorly written, all right - I can't work out if At! is male or female. But he or she is in any case non-notable. StAnselm (talk) 09:31, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's the point - At! does't declare his/her sexuality, apparently. Woogee (talk) 20:20, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:ENT and WP:BIO, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 20:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Schoolage daydreams. — Gwalla | Talk 23:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.