Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Astral Rejection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. plicit 11:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Astral Rejection[edit]

Astral Rejection (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very few reliable sources and of dubious notability. DarklitShadow (talk) 15:31, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:55, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per the provided reviews. I chucked out a badly sourced section. Some of the article in its current state is still questionable. Geschichte (talk) 22:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TLA (talk) 11:37, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per sources provided above. A Newspapers.com search shows up a few more sources as well. I think it's safe to call this a GNG pass now. Schminnte [talk to me] 10:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment and @User:Geschichte: questionable is okay in light of documentation found, no reason to put an article through AfD but rather through the 'Edit' button. --Ouro (blah blah) 15:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.