Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aster Gayavi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 18:04, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aster Gayavi[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The bio fails WP:BLP as well as the significant coverage criteria for WP:BIO. The sources appear to be self-published blogs -- two of them [1] [2] were written by a "mr imam", which is the registered name of the Wikipedia editor who created this article. This kind of circular referencing is not legitimate. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:49, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 22:59, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- per OP -- IamM1rv (talk) 12:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:35, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and lacks significant coverage and fails WP:BIO.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:39, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.