Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Assessment Systems Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus after relisting DGG ( talk ) 19:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment Systems Corporation[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional, lack of secondary sourcing: doesn't seem to pass GNG or CORP. Drmies (talk) 02:34, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 04:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —SerialNumber54129^{paranoia /cheap shit room} 16:22, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. Promo 'cruft. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:54, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indications of notability for the corporation (notability is not inherited), fails GNG and WP:NCORP HighKing⁺⁺ 18:06, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.