Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspire 2010 Charity Dance Competition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. /ƒETCH COMMS / 18:55, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aspire 2010 Charity Dance Competition[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Unreferenced article about an utterly non-notable schools dance competition in Hong Kong. Fails WP:EVENT and WP:RS andy (talk) 13:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aspire 2010 involved many students and also adults, which should be appreciated and respected--> notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickyip a55 (talk • contribs) 13:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC) — Nickyip a55 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

"Notable" has a specific meaning within wikipedia. Please read WP:EVENT and WP:GNG. andy (talk) 14:06, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Aspire definitely has a good depth of coverage and also a wide range of audience.. User:Nickyip_a55 (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.246.136.181 (talk) 14:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:02, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. If "Aspire definitely has a good depth of coverage", then please list some of this coverage. Facebook is not a reliable source and does not constitute coverage. -- Whpq (talk) 16:03, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please Don't Delete -http://mygsis.gsis.edu.hk/CalendarNews_NewsArchiveContent.aspx?id=472b48992ee84c209c1d18ac03fcb029 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bchk totoro (talk • contribs) 10:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC) — Bchk totoro (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant or reliable in depth coverage of this event. Does not meet WP:NOTE guidelines. Barkeep^{Chat | $} 13:03, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It already has sufficient coverage and will gain even more coverage in the future, as this will be held annually in the future. User:Nickyip_a55 —Preceding undated comment added 13:55, 15 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Just saying that there is coverage is coverage without actually providing any is not a strong argument for keeping the article. -- Whpq (talk) 14:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Look, kids, I'm sure this was a great event. Even the logo is excellent. It was put on, it was successful, it served its purpose. That does NOT make it worthy of an article in an international encyclopedia like Wikipedia. Please read the notability criteria at WP:N and you'll understand why. If this article does get deleted, as it probably will be, you might give the event a small (small, mind you!) mention in the article German Swiss International School. --MelanieN (talk) 02:57, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.