Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspinall family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spebi 07:38, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aspinall family[edit]

This is an article on a largely non-notable family. There are two possibly notable members of the family (Arthur Aspinall and Jessie Aspinall) but the rest seem non-notable on their own and notability is not inherited. The references are a privately published genealogy book, an index of biography, a reference which applies to one member of the family and what seems to be a lot of original research. Nick Dowling (talk) 00:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Nick Dowling (talk) 00:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete For a website that encourages family histories and genealogy, see www.ancestry.com. Wikipedia is not a site for obituaries of non-notable ancestors. Edison (talk) 03:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Not much more to add. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 18:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Query is Phillip Aspinall a member? Paul foord (talk) 12:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.