Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Askomill

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Campbeltown. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:55, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Askomill[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I live here. The picture is of the streets High Askomil and Low Askomil in Campbeltown. No resident of Campbeltown has ever alluded to these being a separate settlement. Letters to my house are addressed with "High Askomil, Campbeltown". I can find no reliable source that refers to Askomill as being a separate settlement.

This council webpage explicity refers to High Askomil as a street within Campbeltown. Armarosi (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:21, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Campbeltown. Sources suggest its not a distinctly separate place. Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 17:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- no sign of any independent existence. Failing that, redirect to Campbeltown. Ben Mac Dui 19:08, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Guerillero | My Talk 04:05, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:52, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Campbeltown per nom. (Looks like a lovely place, BTW). OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:50, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 January 28. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 18:27, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.