Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aside

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Unanimous Keep. Peyna 17:24, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Aside[edit]

Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Hbackman 23:01, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it's a dicdef. --Kinu 23:07, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Keep per Where's expansion. Definitely more than a dicdef now, and a useful article at that. --Kinu 02:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep: while before, I would agree that it should be deleted, I just expanded the article to the point where I feel it is more than just a dicdef. Where (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Changed my mind after I saw what Where did for it (good job!). I hadn't thought that something like this could be expanded, but obviously I was wrong. Hbackman 00:37, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The original article was a keep, but it's now a strong keep with Where's contribution. Ruby 04:26, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.