Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asian Spirit Flight 321 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 01:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Spirit Flight 321[edit]

This was subject to a previous AfD more than one year ago and immediately after the accident, in which it was kept. However, there's no evidence it was more than a brief news item and is encyclopedically notable. StarM 02:53, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 02:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 02:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article still does not assert notability, nor has the sources to attest to it. Nothing of significance happened in the incident, other than the fact that it occurred, and that has not changed since its first nomination. No significant edits made since last nomination. - BillCJ (talk) 03:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:AIRCRASH, no notability established, a single news reference, no evidence that this was anything more than a momentary news story. AKRadecki^Speaketh 03:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per AKRadecki. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 04:35, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge info into articles on the aircraft, airline and airport involved ( Done), then Delete. Mjroots (talk) 08:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as per Mjroots, then redirect to relevant section in airliner article, or delete, i'm not fussed. --Ged UK (talk) 09:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Very minor accident...Like said above, it fails WP:AIRCRASH Spikydan1 (talk) 16:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not sign of notability was just news of the day, not even notable enough for a merge into YS-11 article. MilborneOne (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insignificant airline incident. WP is not a news archive. -Atmoz (talk) 19:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The accident fails WP:AIRCRASH and was only really kept as a result of recentism. I nominated the article for deletion last time around, and I still see no reason to keep, and no notability. WP:NOTNEWS also seems to apply. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 18:40, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NOT#NEWS. This is why we shouldn't rush off to create articles about the day's events before we know their full impact. Themfromspace (talk) 01:52, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.