Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashya King case

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep--withdrawn by nominator and no delete !votes. (non-admin closure) Everymorning talk 11:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ashya King case[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No lasting significance. Generated acres of newsprint and sensational coverage while it lasted, but Wikipedia is not news. Although not titled as a BLP it sails on the cusp of BLP1E. The case resulted in no changes to UK legislation and the individual is likely to return to being a low-profile individual. Keri (talk) 12:51, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator New information emerging that proton beam therapy centres are opening in the UK for NHS patients. As this may be as a result of the King case, I'm withdrawing the nom at this stage. Keri (talk) 11:51, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 13:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 13:50, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.