Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashton McGee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Materialscientist (talk) 06:57, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ashton McGee[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Article contains maybe one source that goes beyond WP:ROUTINE (247 Sports), the other are the routine coverage any college player gets (roster page, Perfect Game page). – Muboshgu (talk) 15:29, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:30, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete considering that college baseball is not the main feeder method to the majors, it is an even smaller time sport than college football and basketball.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:38, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This has very little notability even among avid baseball fans like myself. Fails WP:GNG. Songwaters (talk) 20:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This player has won many college baseball awards and is player is well known in the state North Carolina and to ACC baseball fans in general. There are many things written about Ashton McGee from good reliable sources so the is should be kept. Thanks UNC2 (talk) 00:31, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't meet any notability standard. It's also written like a season preview article which doesn't help its case either. Best, GPL93 (talk) 18:46, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.