Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashtin-larold

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:04, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ashtin-larold[edit]

Ashtin-larold (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The WP:SPS Genius.com and the YouTube link clearly do not establish notability, certainly not for a WP:BLP. All I can find by Googling Ashtin-larold are just various other self-published sources. Jasper Deng (talk) 22:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First off I would like to say I messed up, I thought the save button would save it for later, not publish it entirely. So, for now, deletion is understandable.

Furthermore, why doesn't the Genius link. That is a link to his artist biography page. And it isn't self-published in any shape or form. Nothing on there is. I can understand why you said that doesn't establish notability for a WP:BLP. But that is where I learned that "he gained 4 thousand fans." Isn't that a citation?

I'm sorry if this isn't where I was supposed to do this, I'm very new and rusty at this.Bigdbigd03 (talk) 23:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Bigdbigd03[reply]

P.S This page must be deleted, Ashtin-Larold is incorrect. The hyphen ("-" in Ashtin-Larold) should be an underscore. In links that is a substitute for a space. Sorry for any inconvenience caused. Bigdbigd03 (talk) 00:26, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Bigdbigd03[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Ks0stm (TCGE) 22:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.