Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Gosiengfiao
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 22:26, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ashley Gosiengfiao[edit]
- Ashley Gosiengfiao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced biography, article's subject does not appear to have any notability. Google search returns nothing outside of blogs and social media websites. SudoGhost 14:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 15:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- She may very well follow in her older sister's footsteps and become notable someday, but not quite yet. No sources ----> no article. Puchiko (Talk-email) 17:06, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per lack of notable coverage. On a Yahoo! search, all I found were social networking sites as well. No sources, no article, as Puchiko said. SwisterTwister talk 22:38, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Facebook and other personal sites alone are not sufficient to demonstrate notability. --DAJF (talk) 23:26, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.