Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashleigh Udalovas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 01:44, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ashleigh Udalovas[edit]

Ashleigh Udalovas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL as a beauty pageant contestant and local politician. Let'srun (talk) 01:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Politicians, Women, Beauty pageants, and New Jersey. Let'srun (talk) 01:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep as a titleholder, Miss New Jersey might be notable, but I'm not good in pageant competition notability checks. Nevertheless, the Miss New Jersey page suggests that the competition is significant and prominent. I'd lean towards keeping the page. --Mozzcircuit (talk) 14:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I might be swayed by a state-level beauty pageant if the article were actually sourced well enough to pass WP:GNG, but that's in no way "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to pass GNG. This is referenced to a mixture of primary sources that aren't support for notability at all, and local human-interest coverage that's acceptable but not enough all by itself, and we require more than that to deem somebody permanenntly notable for winning a regional beauty pageant. Bearcat (talk) 19:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Would a Redirect be a possibility here?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.