Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashitha (model)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. AfD has been open for 3 weeks with no arguments presented for keeping. Michig (talk) 19:37, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ashitha (model)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable secondary source has substantial coverage to show the notability of the subject. She may be an actor, but that does not prove notability. Fails to meet WP:BIO#Basic_Criteria Wikieditindia (talk) 05:59, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Removed CSDA7 notice. I don't know why someone would tag this for speedy deletion when its clear the article is trying to assert a case for notability. Give editors a chance to review before content is destroyed, please. Thanks.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 13:43, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:06, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:07, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:32, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 21:49, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see a passing mention here, but nothing else and significant to establish notability.Curb Chain (talk) 10:37, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

'Delete - Lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:43, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.