Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish Kohli (Dogra Journalist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ashish Kohli (Dogra Journalist)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG rejected at draft and disruptively moved to main space twice, so bringing here for decision. Theroadislong (talk) 19:35, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — move warring other than passing the article through afc is a major tale sign of possible conflict of interest editing. Subject of the article lacks in-depth significant coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 00:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong, invariably attempts to sneak the article back to mainspace would in future be attempted, this AFD is brilliant so if such a time comes a G4 would come in handy. Celestina007 (talk) 00:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete User admits to being paid by the subject to write this article: [1]. No indication that the topic meets our inclusion standards. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 07:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Promotional and COI-ridden bio. The subject has only received trivial mentions in sketchy sources, like the blacklisted OpIndia. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.