Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashgate Retail Park

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:20, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ashgate Retail Park[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources to establish notability, seems to be a very small and failing retail centre. Few (local) sources found are a long way from establishing notability. Rehevkor ✉ 03:36, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Uninformative and not apt to be of use to WP visitors. Carrite (talk) 05:04, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nowhere near the coverage required to establish why this is notable. Nuttah (talk) 05:50, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"There have been many rumours about shops taking on units at the park." ZOMG. Delete as trashy, non-notable speculative advertising. ╟─Treasury Tag►Counsellor of State─╢ 11:16, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At most warrants a mention in Hucknall, and even then only looks notable for being one of the gloomier recession-fuelled failures. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 16:42, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.