Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asha Bhat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The comment by Раціональне анархіст seems to confuse this article's subject (a woman) with somebody else (a man). Sandstein 11:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asha Bhat[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person's sole claim of notability is as winner of a non-notable pageant. Yet another attempt by a certain user (with massive and very clear conflict of interest) to promote Miss Supranational, which has been declared non-notable in multiple AFDs. Although the previous Miss Supranational Mutya Johanna Datul passed AFD due to general coverage, surely this is a case of someone who is notable solely for a single event which is demonstrably non-notable in itself? When I do a search excluding "Supranational" almost all Google hits disappear. Mabalu (talk) 11:47, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Notability is not backed up by independent sources. The Banner talk 12:43, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:51, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Miss Supranational is a notable international pageant according to the reputed website "angelopedia.com"..

The person of concern is notable as a 2nd runner up winner at the Indian beauty pageant Miss Diva - 2014 and the winner of the notable international pageant described above. 11:43, 11 December 2014 (IST)

Runner-ups are not notable, sorry. As far as I can see Angelopedia is just another wiki, and alternative wikis are not considered reputable sources for Wikipedia. Mabalu (talk) 10:53, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even so, angelopedia is not exactly an independent and reliable source. The Banner talk 02:39, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:13, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:33, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Mister_International#Titleholders, according to which, he has been dethroned, with another person now in claim of the 2012 title. (IMO few if any of these persons, many of whom have articles, are independently notable, and should all be similarly redirected unless otherwise notable.)--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 09:36, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.