Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asexual cats

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 21:10, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Asexual cats[edit]

This seems to be an editorial, but it is not very coherent. -- Beland 18:16, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as original research (being kind, more like nonsense). Ifnord 18:25, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Editorializes (POV?) and isn't linked anywhere. --StuffOfInterest 18:35, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Original research, non-verifiable (can't ask the cats, can you?) Jtmichcock 23:51, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, OR. My best guess is it's some kind of weird attack on neutering ("act of mutilation"). --Last Malthusian 13:26, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing apposite on Google for "asexual cats" either. Delete, OR - David Gerard 17:43, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Alex Schenck (that's Linuxbeak to you) 17:57, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wiktionary it. Asexuality is real, cats are real. Not original research. Zordrac 01:30, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it's unencyclopaedic. Izehar 15:43, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - contains nothing not available under Asexual and Cats Catamorphism 20:59, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.