Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aseguradores de la calidad
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Copyright violation from first version and all subsequent versions are a derivative work (translation). Whpq (talk) 04:54, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Aseguradores de la calidad[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Aseguradores de la calidad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Procedural listing per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 16 * Pppery * it has begun... 20:47, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Management and Computing. Skynxnex (talk) 21:52, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The spanish concept should not be a redirect: WP:FORRED. It is not even the standard spanish term, that would be Aseguramiento de la Calidad,. As for the body of the article, its nature is not encyclopedic and should be deleted as per WP:NOTHOW.Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 23:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: more than likely a copyvio run through machine translation. But even if it isn't, this is OR/SYNTH that doesn't belong here. Owen× ☎ 01:16, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per my RfD vote. Jay 💬 06:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I've tagged this for G12 (copyvio) speedy deletion, since the first revision is directly copied (in Spanish) from http://profayadira.yolasite.com/resources/Roles_desarrollo_software.pdf#page=14, followed by another user's not-very-skillful translation, since which it has been rephrased a bit. SilverLocust 💬 23:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Rather embarrassing that this article survived for 12 years. Liz Read! Talk! 01:57, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.