Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Home row. W.marsh 16:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asdf[edit]

These four letters on the keyboard are not very notable... the article itself is just a list of isolated and speculative trivia about the letters with no cohesion between them. Remy B 12:23, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Useless, non-encyclopedia trivia verging on nonsense. andy 17:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. ~Spe bi 05:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This has become a notable part of computing culture. -- BlastOButter42 ^See Hear _Speak 07:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's no assertion of notability in the article (hard to see how there could be). No references. andy 09:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 10:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Is there a related article that any sourced notable characteristics of "asdf" can be merged in to, such as Computer Passwords?--Xnuala (talk) 10:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Password strength#Weak passwords already mentions this term, and says more or less everything that may be of some interest about it. Tizio 10:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article just states the obvious. Corpx 12:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment as long as ASDF continues to note that these are the first four letters of the middle row of a standard computer keyboard, sometimes used when someone types in gibberish, then I think it'd be fine to redirect this to ASDF. The sequence asdf shows up enough that a one sentence explanation at ASDF is worthwhile. --JayHenry 17:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unlike qwerty, nonnotable `'mikka 17:57, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete zxcvbnm doesn't get an article :) --ROASTYTOAST 21:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nonnotable. Useight 23:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Home row; j, k, l, and ; deserve their screentime too. Phony Saint 00:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. There are lots of links to this article (albeit most from talk pages). -- MightyWarrior 11:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to and merge good content with Home row per Phony Saint. --User:Krator (t c) 18:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect not notable for an entire article, is notable as a sub section of home row Urdna 00:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Phony Saint. —David Eppstein 01:53, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Krator DewiMorgan 21:38, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.