Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asad Afridi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Happy to undelete if sourcing is located, in line with GNG/SPORTCRIT, or to permit merging in the event that an appropriate list is created later. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Asad Afridi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. I found no coverage about him. Störm (talk) 22:58, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Sukkur will have significantly more redlinked players than many other sides, having participcated in 22 first-class matches. To go into making lists of all these redlinks seems unnecessary right now. Bobo . 23:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 23:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a total failure of GNG. It is time we started having better standards of article creation. It is too easy to make such sub-standard articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In fairness, this article was created nearly 12 years ago. When people had respect for the aims of the project. The fact that nobody - including the people who participate in AfDs - attempts to improve the articles, is their own choice. To compare what people were aiming to achieve then, which was a completed project, and what is being achieved now, which is... the opposite... is like comparing apples and oranges. Bobo . 16:31, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - So used to these happening that I think we've grown tired of !voting these days. Bobo . 09:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nominally passes NCRIC, which by consensus only provides an extremely weak presumption of notability, but fails all meaningful guidelines including GNG and SPORTCRIT. No sources beyond wide ranging databases. No suitable list to merge to. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 11:29, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.