Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aryen Suresh Kute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:05, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aryen Suresh Kute[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable tech entrepreneur. All three sources cited appeared to be a distributed paid content and an independent search to determine the subject's notability returned negative Noneate (talk) 13:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Noneate (talk) 13:08, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PROMO, only PR and pay to publish website listings found. I swear we've had someone that looked like him before in AfD... Oaktree b (talk) 14:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. (Note that I published the article from AfC, which now seems like a misjudgement to me. Self-trout feels appropriate.) I based my evaluation of the sources on discussions from WP:RSN, also found at WP:NPRSG. Ater looking a little further into them, I agree that these are not the high-quality sources required to establish notability, particularly for a BLP. Since there seems to be a lot of agreement on this, I would suggest a brief discussion at RSN to reclassify these sources for future convenience. @Noneate @Oaktree b what do you think? Actualcpscm (talk) 14:32, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but someone would have to nominate it or create the discussion there at RSN, I'm not sure how to do that. Oaktree b (talk) 15:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: PROMO only. I'd suggest returning to draft space, but I don't think this has a six-months chance at improvement. I agree that the sources should be added to a discussion at RSN. UtherSRG (talk) 14:40, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Here are the refs for easy access: [1] [2] [3] - UtherSRG (talk) 11:56, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obvious self-promotion. Deb (talk) 14:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have written plenty of business bios, and this person is clearly insufficiently notable, failing WP:GNG. Edwardx (talk) 12:42, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:51, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All sources are sponsored. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 07:09, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteFalls short of meeting the notability guidelines mentioned in WP:GNG.AmusingWeasel (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.