Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arun Sureshkumar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —SpacemanSpiff 13:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arun Sureshkumar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E: The subject is only notable for single event and I failed to find significant coverage in independent secondary reliable sources for a stand-alone article. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:40, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I don't know whats the problem ? (Kalyan.cp (talk)) —Preceding undated comment added 11:48, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone here ! Respond my messege. the article cited with reliable sources such as indian express, chronicle, NDTV etc. why you wre add a deletion tag on it (Kalyan.cp (talk)) —Preceding undated comment added 13:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, regretfully – pretty much the textbook definition of BLP1E as far as I can see. Laurdecl ^talk 14:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete One Event does not establish notability, no matter how much coverage that single event receives. Exemplo347 (talk) 15:20, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as 1E isn't the actual concern here, it's self-advertising given this is clear autobiography and the templates are being removed, thus unsuitable here. SwisterTwister talk 15:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:11, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per BLP1E. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we have usually deleted articles about business persons. There's nothing in the article to suggest that the subject is anything more than a run of the mill business person. We are a charity and not a webhost for businesses. In fact, charities such as Hostelling International-Canada have lost charity status due to hosting for profit. Bearian (talk) P.S. Every person gets 15 minutes of fame locally. That's what BLP1E means. Bearian (talk) 21:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable security industry person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:07, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem on it ?? I think It's good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.216.20.49 (talk) 07:12, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.