Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artur Zurawski (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 15:46, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Artur Zurawski[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted. Still doesn't seem to meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Does WP:SPA creator have WP:COI? Boleyn (talk) 12:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:37, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:43, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. AdrianGamer (talk) 14:45, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since article only includes external links with no references at all. Two of the external links seem to duplicate each other content-wise and little if none of them could be converted reliable sources. The Average Wikipedian (talk) 15:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Subject has worked steadily in film and television since 1996 and has turned out hundreds of titles, including directorial credits for TV series episodes, theatrical features and shorts, as well as music videos. He is also a well known photographer. As of this writing, the entry has 11 inline cites, with a number of others, in the Polish press, which may be added. His name is already linked as cinematographer on two features, Jackpot (2013 film) and Mardaani, with other of his many credits presenting potential material for articles. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 06:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep 29 Cinematographer credits in films I think it's makes him notable. Katerina dunaway (talk) 03:22, 28 July 2015 (UTC) — Katerina dunaway (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sockpuppet of Sofiamar (talk • contribs). [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Swarm ♠ 01:32, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 01:37, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets minimum GNG —Мандичка^YO 😜 02:13, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you care to elaborate? Which part of the GNG does he meet? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:52, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Regarding the "Polish press" clam, I see two links. [1] is a blurb about his appearance in a Polish talk show. [2] is an online newsletter/zine of a Polish professional association for movie-makers and like. Neither is a quality source. The English sources, aside from self-published, seem to variations of one article published (and republished/copied/re-edited) in Indian press, [3]. I cannot find anything else. In the end, I can't see why those refs make him notable (encyclopedic). Not each film director is encyclopedic; one needs to achieve some limelight - and this marginal coverage shown here so far does not seem sufficient to me. Let him win some awards, or for his work and/or life to be covered in more mainstream sources. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:51, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:51, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 21:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.