Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arti Film

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:39, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arti Film[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising, fails WP:GNG. The Banner talk 14:35, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete While I can't prove that foreign language RSes don't exist, in its current state (1 sentence of content, redlink list farm, and many useless bluelinks which don't reference these folks), this is IMO a good WP:DYNAMITE candidate. Roberticus talk 15:04, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:43, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:SPA article setting out material that can comfortably sit on the firm's own website. No claim or evidence of notability; I agree with User:Roberticus's assessment. AllyD (talk) 05:03, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.