Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Napiontek

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 03:34, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Napiontek[edit]

Arthur Napiontek (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to meet GNG requirements, the most I could find was passing mentions. Greyjoy talk 10:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Greyjoy talk 10:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Greyjoy talk 10:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:14, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete not even close to meeting GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:36, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Delete: WP:GNG isn't made out, as far as I can tell, and the subject's acting roles do not yet meet WP:NACTOR. He is young and his profile may rise, but the article was created a little prematurely, in my opinion. Dflaw4 (talk) 02:06, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • The article was created 8 years ago, so that would be a lot prematurely if he has not yet made notability. Anyway he is 33, so not all that young.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I really don't understand you, John Pack Lambert. Almost every time I try to engage with you in these AFDs, you ignore me—and yet now, when I'm not attempting to engage with you, you do engage with me. Dflaw4 (talk) 06:26, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. I am unable to find any substantive coverage in reliable sources about him and/or his work. --Kinu t/c 13:55, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.