Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur J. Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 19:41, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur J. Williams[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this page has no sources and there is no evidence of his notability Natg 19 (talk) 19:50, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. State legislators pass WP:POLITICIAN. The article has a dead link at the NC General Assembly's website. I found 3 other pages confirming that Williams was a state rep: [1], [2] and [3]. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As Gene93k has noted, Williams passes WP:POLITICIAN by virtue of being a member of the North Carolina General Assembly. Gobōnobō ⁺ ^c 09:12, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Agree with views expressed above. Satisfies WP:POLITICIAN as a member of the North Carolina General Assembly. Finnegas (talk) 14:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as all above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:48, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.