Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur (2011)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur (2011)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filming has not started. Appears to fail WP:NOTFILM ttonyb (talk) 05:37, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Cliff smith ^talk 16:58, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NFF. Lugnuts (talk) 09:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NFF and the author is a notorious serial sockpuppet whose trivial and often nonsensical edits consume inordinate editor time in cleanup. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AlexLevyOne. JohnInDC (talk) 10:42, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFF: no verification that principal photography has begun. Cliff smith ^talk 16:37, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice for recreation as simply Too Soon for this article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NFF and WP:CRYSTAL. Doc Strange^MailboxLogbook 01:09, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Textbook case of WP:NFF. — C M B J 04:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.