Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artbound initiative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Artbound initiative[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks notability and coverage in independent reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 21:09, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 22:02, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unfortunately, not notable. The cause is good, but there are no enough independant references to be notable. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 14:38, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete just delete. no words to add. Light2021 (talk) 20:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.