Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrowhead-like matrix

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:21, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arrowhead-like matrix[edit]

Arrowhead-like matrix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not verifiable. No references in the article and none found. Not to be confused with Arrowhead matrix. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Without any references, this article is well beyond my paygrade to assess. Nothing found on Google scholar. Surprisingly, nothing in the WP:Daily Mail, either. Lots of other scary stuff found in Category:Matrices. I'm not a believer in stamping on insects (or articles) because we're scared of them and don't understand them. I have no idea what this is. Why not a redirect to Arrowhead matrix if all else fails? Like=similar. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 00:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Well, I'm in the same camp. Quite impossible to assess for me without any sources. Absent any enlightenment in this regard, that redirect might be the best option, because currently it mayyy not be that useful for the vaunted "general audience". --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:36, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The mathematics appears to be valid, but the lack of sources and references indicates this is OR. The topic is somewhat related to Arrowhead matrix, but insufficiently so to justify a redirect.  --Lambiam 19:33, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unsourced and unmotivated WP:OR. Nsk92 (talk) 13:12, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.