Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arristimo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:34, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Arristimo[edit]
- Arristimo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An unreferenced WP:NEOLOGISM. PROD was contested. VQuakr (talk) 15:50, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO and as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Armbrust Talk Contribs 16:34, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wikipedia is not for something made up one day. The history is confusing, has it been through AfD before? --MelanieN (talk) 20:30, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. In my opinion, it is obvious that this is just something someone made up. Cindamuse (talk) 02:37, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I found this comment on the article's talk page; copying it here since they seem to be trying to express an argument for Keep:
- This is an actual made up word that was coined as been described and used often by a large group of friends on many occassions. Please don't delete. (This unsigned comment made by User:75.134.53.197.)
- If anything this comment seems to confirm WP:MADEUP. --MelanieN (talk) 14:15, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.