Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Array DVD magazine

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Array DVD magazine[edit]

Array DVD magazine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no significant coverage and the owner is up for deletion here - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil D. Foster. SL93 (talk) 06:01, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - This is so thoroughly non-notable that honestly I can't really tell if it ever existed at all. TimothyJosephWood 15:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as TJW said above, definitely not notable. I'm kind of surprised somebody didn't speedy it. White Arabian Filly Neigh 21:49, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.