Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arpanet (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Gerald Donald along with Arpanet (producer). Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 13:50, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arpanet (band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is another page with more information about this group under Arpanet (producer). I feel that since that one is the more complete page Arpanet (band) should either be deleted or merged into Arpanet (producer). - Human historian (talk) 04:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, assuming they are better known/more notable as a producer than as a band - if not, it seems to me that the more "complete" one shouldn't be an issue as, either way, it can be merged into a better fit. Zelse81 (talk) 05:31, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge both Arpanet (band) and Arpanet (producer) into Gerald Donald. We don't usually have separate articles for people and their pseudonyms, do we? At a bare minimum merge the band and producer articles. Glenfarclas (talk) 10:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Arpanet (producer). If you think a redirect is in order, there's no point in taking it to AfD, because you don't need admin powers to do it. Just do it yourself. — Gwalla | Talk 23:08, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.