Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Zamora

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:09, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arnold Zamora[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was forwarded an email request from the subject, he wishes for the article to be deleted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BLP#Summary_deletion.2C_salting.2C_and_courtesy_blanking states that while a person who is not well known can request for deletion, it cannot be deleted outright because there is no negative information. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 03:27, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Upon a second opinion, the sources were looked at and....it was not good. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 04:37, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 20:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Although the article is well written it doesn't appear to have sufficient sources from multiple reliable sources to establish that the subject of the article passes WP:GNG. A google news search brings up a few mentions, but none of them have the subject of this article as the primary subject of the news story. Furthermore, a quick glance of what is found online does not appear to provide sufficient results for the subject of this article to pass WP:MUSICBIO. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 13:14, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree with RCLC, too much data coming from a few links? I don't think it's possible. why are there online player links here? --Eaglestorm (talk) 07:25, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete aside from his having requested it, it does lack enough sources to be verifiable or prove notability.--Obsidi♠n^Soul 07:00, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.