Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Motor Supply

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Please come over to my talk page if anyone wants to userfy the article to work on and I'll happily undelete it for you. Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 17:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arnold Motor Supply[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

despite the documentation, this article is so promotional and so much devted to praising even the trivia, that it should be deleted and started over. DGG ( talk ) 05:31, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Incubate. I agree with DGG. It's focused too much on trivia and promotion. The sources seem to exist to support an article, but this one is not acceptable. It reads like a PR guy wrote it for the corporation. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:43, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy for now. There is some opportunity here, with the offline resources, and some research. It just needs to be toned down and have it's citations improved (or content removed). SarahStierch (talk) 00:55, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and give the creator the list of references. Had DGG tagged this for {{db-g11}}, I would have deleted it under that criterion. Nyttend (talk) 16:14, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.