Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Kwok
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 05:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Arnold Kwok[edit]
- Arnold Kwok (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor contributions - does not meet WP:NACTOR Peter Rehse (talk) 23:33, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete not enough significant roles, the sources come no where close to passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:NACTOR. DrStrauss talk 18:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete – does not meet notability criteria. Citobun (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Does not meet WP:NACTOR.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 19:20, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep WP:NACTOR: "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following." 7k fans on Facebook, 5k fans on Weibo, 24k followers on Instagram. Probably "large" enough, if barely. Timmyshin (talk) 04:31, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.