Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold Gjergjaj

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arnold Gjergjaj[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable boxer - does not meet WP:NBOX Peter Rehse (talk) 19:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 19:24, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mr RD 20:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Mr RD 20:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NBOX and GNG since there's a lack of significant independent coverage. I question the independence of a local paper that claims he is widely regarded as the best heavyweight fighter in the world.Mdtemp (talk) 15:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree with the previous comments and reasons. The article labeled as "Switzerland honours Arnold Gjergjaj" is a bit misleading--the Swiss town of 15,000 inhabitants where he lives gave him an award. He may became a notable boxer (under WP guidelines), but he's not there yet. Papaursa (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Close but no cigar. If there's just one more good piece of info, then it probably qualifies. Tippex for the soul (talk) 16:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Every day AfD warnings are stuck on new user accounts as their welcome to Wikipedia. This one, however, is my favorite so far. Not only is there zero mention of this AfD on the creators talk page, there's no welcome, no talk. And they've been here since October 18th!!! Well, done! --MurderByDeadcopy^"bang!" 21:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.