Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arne Starr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Original PROD's reasoning is upheld. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arne Starr[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

On June 27th, this article was proposed for deletion with the rationale:

Notability, very poorly written, advertisement for someone who appears to be, primarily, a film extra.

The article was dePRODed with the rationale:

this is someone who worked in professional publications which were widely distributed. Some pinheads assertion that this is just an "ad" for the subject merely reveals their ignorance on this person.

The article was de rePRODed without comment and I proceeded to delete it as an expired PROD without noticing it had been contested; this has been brought to my attention on my user talk page by the article's creator & subject, and I've agreed to undelete it & send to AfD for further review; I consider myself neutral on the topic. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 22:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Doesn't satisfy WP:NACTOR, and I don't consider being an inker sufficiently notable either. There's a two-part interview for startrek.com[1][2] and a "whatever happened to ...?" bit[3], but that's not enough IMO. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.