Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arne Söderlund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Flag officers are typically held to pass WP:NSOLDIER and thus AfDs. Consensus backs this. (non-admin closure) Sulfurboy (talk) 05:00, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arne Söderlund[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable author/former sailor. Cannot find any reputable sources anywhere, any coverage of this book doesn't meet notability guidelines and is trivial. Serhatserhatserhat (talk) 04:12, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep He meets WP:SOLDIER Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Which of the criterium does he meet? Serhatserhatserhat (talk) 14:02, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:55, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no RS provided that he was a RADM that would be necessary to satisfy #2 of WP:SOLDIER and even so that is just a presumption of notability, but he lacks WP:SIGCOV in multiple WP:RS. Mztourist (talk) 15:15, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As a rear admiral he quite clearly meets WP:SOLDIER #2. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:41, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Meets no. 2 of WP:SOLDIER. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 11:22, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Rank meets SOLDIER criteria; article contains sourcing verifying retirement rank.--Goldsztajn (talk) 21:39, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:SOLDIER#2 .Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.