Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Army of Birds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Boldly redirected, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:34, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Army of Birds[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject appears to lack notability WP:MUSIC and has no sources listed. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —Mike moral ♪♫ 23:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Gaggle (band)#Singles as there is no indication this song is notable for a standalone article. -- Whpq (talk) 14:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Gaggle (band)#Singles , Per Whpq's logic. Finnegas (talk) 12:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Gaggle (band)#Singles - no supporting information, no indication the single is notable apart from the album. 78.26 (I'm no IP, talk to me!) 17:12, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.