Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Army Hotel Management Institute

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Army Hotel Management Institute[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable hospitality training organization. Tagged for notability for a year. Several newspapers briefly covered its launch in June 2009 (when the article was created).[1][2][3] Searches of the usual Google types, EBSCO, Gale, HighBeam, and ProQuest, for any further coverage of সেনা হোটেল ম্যানেজমেন্ট ইন্সটিটিউটের / Sena Hotel Management Institute / Army Hotel Management Institute, found only a single passing mention.[4]. WP:ORGSIG asks us to consider whether an organization has had any significant or demonstrable effects on anything. The lack of persistence and depth in coverage indicates no. Fails WP:ORG. Worldbruce (talk) 00:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 00:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 00:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 00:13, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails NCORP & GNG. KGirlTrucker81^{huh? what I've been doing} 00:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – per nom. Lack of coverage in outside sources and doesn't meet GNG. United States Man (talk) 21:39, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable and as stated fails GNG. Kierzek (talk) 15:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is more than that to cover such articles. Light2021 (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.