Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arms Against War
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:10, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Arms Against War[edit]
No verification that such a group exists. Wikipedia isn't a soapbox. Sandstein 16:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless sourced to indicate notability. --W(t) 16:13, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. Bobby1011 16:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I do not understand the objections to my submitted article, we are a legitimate group and cause no harm or self promotion through this. We are simply trying to unite against war. As to our right to be on Wikipedia, perhaps you could let me know just what is the criteria for 'notability'? I know you are not a soapbox, but you are a rich source of information that I rely on for new as well as established information. Please do not delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.93.240 (talk • contribs)
- Comment: Please refer to WP:Notability, WP:NOT. In a nutshell, first you get famous, then you get an article, not the other way round. Greetings, Sandstein 16:41, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.
- Delete WP is not a soapbox, per nom --Ruby 16:39, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — Fails WP:NOT in that Wikipedia is not a soapbox. For more info, read those two links and this one: Wikipedia:Notability.
— Bill W. (Talk) (Contrib) – February 20, 2006, 16:43 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.