Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armenianwingchun
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 17:40, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Armenianwingchun[edit]
- Armenianwingchun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non Notable Organisation Edinburgh Wanderer 23:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Completely fails Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies); Google News and Books searches for "Armenian Wing Chun" bring up nothing. Primary contributor, Armenianwingchun (contribs), has a clear conflict of interest and seems to be trying to promote his organization. The only hope for this article is if sources are found in Armenian, although even that seems very unlikely, as Google News and Books searches also turn up zilch for "Հայերեն թեւը" ("Armenian Wing"; Google Translate doesn't know what to make of "Chun"). Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 16:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete When the first page of Google results asks you if you mean something else, and the rest is the company's website, and domaintools.com type links, you know you are in trouble. Further searching finds literally nothing that would qualify as a reliable source. This "wing" was only founded in 2007, which may explain the lack of sourcing. WP:TOOSOON to assume it will ever be notable as nothing in the article is verifiable. Dennis Brown (talk) 18:19, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Just not finding coverage in reliable sources. There are many primary sources available, most from the Armenian Wing Chun Kung Fu Association's Official Web Site, and some directory listings, but not third-party coverage in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I see no indication of notability and no independent sources. Mdtemp (talk) 15:33, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.