Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkham Horror: Game Play/Fan Fiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete, G7, requested by author. The author had also contested the proposed deletion of the page, which is why I started the AfD. —C.Fred (talk) 03:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Arkham Horror: Game Play/Fan Fiction[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a laundry list of problems. It's original research: it's User:MyArkhamHorror's interpretations of a game. It cites no independent reliable sources. The fan fiction in question is his own fic, so there's a COI issue in play. Hand-in-hand with the lack of independent sources, the stories aren't covered anywhere, so they aren't notable. To top it off, it sounds like the stories haven't even been written yet. I don't quite think this is a speedy candidate. However, I suggest deletion in the strongest possible way. —C.Fred (talk) 02:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will be deleating it, well apparently I cant so whoever does it.....

MyArkhamHorror

Speedy Delete G7 - I've tagged the article Speedy Delete G7 as the article's author appears to have requested deletion above. (Failing that, Delete as fundamentally unencyclopaedic content - fan fiction.) - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.