Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arizona State Route 48
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:13, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Arizona State Route 48[edit]
- Arizona State Route 48 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I have not been able to find any reliable sources for this. Prod was removed because "the deletion of this article may be controversial". NE2 11:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not a state route but a proposed one. So there's no automatic notability here. Now, if it was widely covered in reliable sources, it might be notable even in its proposed state... but the article doesn't establish that. Without sources we don't know who's proposing it, how serious the proposal is, or even when it was proposed and what it's status is now. --Rividian (talk) 14:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverfiable. --Polaron | Talk 15:16, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Rividian Admrboltz (talk) 17:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I always find future roads to be speculation. --Rschen7754 (T C) 17:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment As reviewing admin of the prod, I further explained on the Talk page, "Because this article has been rated as having Mid-importance by the Roads Project, I'm reluctant to delete it without more discussion at WP:AFD instead of WP:PROD." JGHowes talk 19:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That assessment was done by a bot apparently. --Rividian (talk) 19:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Correct - at the time, all state highways were to be classified under Mid - so I ran the bot down the Arizona state highways category. --Rschen7754 (T C) 20:01, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep, I wondered about its Start-class assessment instead of Stub, too. Doing a quick scan of The Daily Courier I found an April 1, 2008, source and have added it to the article. JGHowes talk 20:07, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Correct - at the time, all state highways were to be classified under Mid - so I ran the bot down the Arizona state highways category. --Rschen7754 (T C) 20:01, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- That assessment was done by a bot apparently. --Rividian (talk) 19:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:V and WP:OR. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.