Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arizmendi Bakery (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination was withdrawn by nominator(as indicated at the bottom). (non-admin closure) Burning Pillar (talk) 22:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arizmendi Bakery[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:AUD: "Evidence of significant coverage by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability. On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability; at least one regional, statewide, provincial, national, or international source is necessary."

I cannot find any non-local coverage of this bakery. While there appears to be plenty of mentions and reviews from (primarily San Francisco based) local media, I couldn't find any regional or national coverage. Sam Walton (talk) 12:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. KQED and San Francisco Chronicle (sfgate.com) are regional media. - Bri (talk) 13:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The New York Times Magazine had a 2014 about this bakery as a model of worker-coop success. [1]. A 2000 San Jose Mercury article on the same topic was syndicated by Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service. [2] A GBooks search shows some book references of varying significance, some focused on the coop structure [3][4][5], some mentioning the bakery chain's culinary significance. --Arxiloxos (talk) 21:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those look to be enough sources; withdrawing my nom. Thanks Arxiloxos! Sam Walton (talk) 21:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.